UT Martin at S Illinois
Women's · Friday, November 20, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Banterra Center. UT Martin our rank 271 · 2-2; S Illinois our rank 300 · 0-3.
Who will win UT Martin vs S Illinois?
The model gives Southern Illinois a 61% chance to beat UT Martin, with a projected score of S Illinois 73, UT Martin 70.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CooperG · 35 min | 13.8 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 15+ 42% | |
| BakerG · 31 min | 10.4 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 10+ 51% | |
| McClineG · 19 min | 10.0 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 10+ 48% | |
| NelsonG · 32 min | 7.4 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 5+ 68% | |
| SmithG · 28 min | 11.1 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 10+ 56% | |
| SimsG · 21 min | 10.1 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 10+ 49% | |
| EspeletF · 20 min | 8.1 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 10+ 34% | |
| JonesG · 24 min | 6.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 5+ 63% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
UT Martin 2-2WWLL
- Nov 12L 59-103at Missouri
- Nov 8L 68-114vs Mississippi St
- Nov 5W 105-41vs Christian Brothers
- Nov 2W 90-89vs E Kentucky
- Last 4
- 2–2, scoring 80.5 and allowing 86.8
S Illinois 0-3LLL
- Nov 12L 57-71at E Kentucky
- Nov 6L 55-96at Indiana
- Nov 3L 70-75vs Illinois Springfield
- Last 3
- 0–3, scoring 60.7 and allowing 80.7
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| UT Martin | S Illinois | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 89.4 187th | 83.5 278th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 103.9 342nd | 100.5 308th |
| Possessions a game | 73.3 76th | 73.3 76th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 45.1% 200th | 44.2% 267th |
| Opponents' shooting | 51.8% 363rd | 48.1% 318th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 22.7% 111th | 20.9% 16th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 29.5% 333rd | 30.9% 287th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 233rd | 0.17 351st |
The widest gap: UT Martin's offense (187th) against S Illinois's defense (308th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- UT Martin 33, S Illinois 35
- First-half margin
- S Illinois by 2.0
- First-half points, both teams
- 67.8
- Projected second half
- UT Martin 37, S Illinois 38
- Second-half points, both teams
- 75.2
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- UT Martin, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 4 · 40.2 scored, 43.2 allowed
- S Illinois, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 3 · 29.7 scored, 42.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
UT Martin
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia SmithG | 28 | 11.1 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 56% · 4+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Tyler JonesG | 24 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 2+ reb 61% · 2+ ast 50% | |||||
| Raven SimsG | 21 | 10.1 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 50% to play · 10+ pts 49% · 4+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
| Lily EspeletF | 20 | 8.1 | 3.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 4+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Sidni MiddletonG | 18 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 41% · 2+ ast 47% | |||||
| Maddie PenneyG | 18 | 6.1 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 57% · 3+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Sophie Chard PeloquinG | 17 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 0.9 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 36% · 3+ reb 41% · 1+ threes 38% | |||||
| Kennedy HortonF | 15 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 3+ reb 55% | |||||
Missed the last game: Raven Sims (23 min a game).
S Illinois
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kayla CooperG | 35 | 13.8 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 42% · 5+ reb 57% · 3+ ast 59% | |||||
| Tkiyah NelsonG | 32 | 7.4 | 5.0 | 4.1 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 68% · 5+ reb 52% · 4+ ast 56% | |||||
| Braxcynn BakerG | 31 | 10.4 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 10+ pts 51% · 4+ reb 53% · 2+ threes 57% | |||||
| Kynnedi DavisG | 28 | 7.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 2+ reb 56% · 2+ ast 57% | |||||
| Shakara McClineG | 19 | 10.0 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 40% · 2+ ast 42% | |||||
| Yaiza Paredes DiazF | 16 | 5.1 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 23% | |||||
| Mia GainesC | 12 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 23% · 3+ reb 57% | |||||
| Carmen MoralesC | 11 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 19% · 3+ reb 43% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…