Bryant at Northeastern
Women's · Saturday, November 21, 2026, 1:00 PM ET at Cabot Center. Bryant our rank 157 · 4-0; Northeastern our rank 217 · 2-1.
Who will win Bryant vs Northeastern?
The model gives Bryant a 57% chance to beat Northeastern, with a projected score of Bryant 63, Northeastern 60.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryant | |||||
| ManciniG · 36 min | 12.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 15+ 36% | |
| McNamaraF · 34 min | 11.9 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 10+ 61% | |
| ScottF · 29 min | 11.1 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 10+ 56% | |
| WedemeyerG · 26 min | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 10+ 41% | |
| Northeastern | |||||
| CollinsG · 31 min | 12.7 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 15+ 35% | |
| TrambleF · 26 min | 12.1 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 10+ 63% | |
| QuelizG · 32 min | 11.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 10+ 59% | |
| MatthewsG · 30 min | 7.3 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 5+ 68% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Nia Scott: Bryant 50%Northeastern 50%
The white mark is the call with her: Bryant 57%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Bryant without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryant | ||||
| Nia Scott | 2.3 | 50% | −7 | 61–62 |
| Mia Mancini | 1.4 | 53% | −4 | 62–61 |
| Izzy Adams | 0.9 | 54% | −3 | 62–61 |
| Cameron McNamara | 0.7 | 55% | −2 | 62–61 |
| Northeastern | ||||
| Justice Tramble | 0.9 | 60% | +3 | 63–60 |
| Anja Bukvic | 0.7 | 59% | +2 | 63–60 |
Change is in Bryant's win chance, in points. Scores read Bryant, then Northeastern. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Bryant 4-0WWWW
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 64.0 and allowing 45.2
Northeastern 2-1LWW
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 64.3 and allowing 57.3
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Bryant | Northeastern | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 88.3 212th | 88.6 206th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 89.9 105th | 97.9 252nd |
| Possessions a game | 69.9 341st | 70.8 296th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.0% 91st | 47.8% 54th |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.9% 148th | 44.4% 114th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.0% 228th | 23.9% 215th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.3% 206th | 33.8% 131st |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 182nd | 0.19 285th |
The widest gap: Bryant's defense (105th) against Northeastern's offense (206th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Bryant 30, Northeastern 29
- First-half margin
- Bryant by 1.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 58.3
- Projected second half
- Bryant 33, Northeastern 32
- Second-half points, both teams
- 64.7
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Bryant, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 35.5 scored, 23.8 allowed
- Northeastern, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 3 · 35.3 scored, 27.3 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Bryant
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mia ManciniG | 36 | 12.9 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 1.9 |
| 15+ pts 36% · 5+ reb 49% · 2+ threes 51% | |||||
| Cameron McNamaraF | 34 | 11.9 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 61% · 6+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Izzy AdamsG | 32 | 7.9 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 4+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 57% | |||||
| Nia ScottF | 29 | 11.1 | 7.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 56% · 8+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 35% | |||||
| Martina BobaG | 28 | 5.3 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Genevive WedemeyerG | 26 | 9.0 | 2.7 | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 3+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 53% | |||||
Northeastern
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yirsy QuelizG | 32 | 11.5 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.0 |
| 10+ pts 59% · 3+ reb 52% · 2+ threes 54% | |||||
| Camryn CollinsG | 31 | 12.7 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 15+ pts 35% · 3+ reb 58% · 2+ threes 45% | |||||
| Morgan MatthewsG | 30 | 7.3 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 68% · 4+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Justice TrambleF | 26 | 12.1 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 63% · 6+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 16% | |||||
| Kailee Beaudion-FoliakiG | 22 | 5.7 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 54% · 3+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 30% | |||||
| Anja BukvicG | 20 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Summer BostockG | 16 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 2+ reb 60% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Maya SummervilleF | 16 | 2.6 | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 20% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 36% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…