Grand Canyon at SMU
Women's · Saturday, November 21, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at Moody Coliseum (Dallas). Grand Canyon our rank 116 · 2-0; SMU our rank 147 · 4-0.
Who will win Grand Canyon vs SMU?
The model gives SMU a 51% chance to beat Grand Canyon, with a projected score of SMU 65, Grand Canyon 65.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hagans Jr.G · 31 min | 16.6 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 15+ 58% | |
| JamesG · 21 min | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 10+ 47% | |
| KingG · 20 min | 8.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 10+ 35% | |
| KaneF · 23 min | 6.1 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 5+ 57% | |
| YiechF · 29 min | 13.1 | 7.1 | 1.4 | 15+ 37% | |
| FozG · 26 min | 10.6 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 10+ 52% | |
| SallmanC · 24 min | 10.6 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 10+ 53% | |
| MannG · 22 min | 10.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 10+ 48% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Grace Ezebilo: Grand Canyon 56%SMU 44%
The white mark is the call with her: SMU 51%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | SMU without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Ezebilo | 1.9 | 44% | −7 | 66–64 |
| Mailien Rolf | 1.1 | 47% | −4 | 65–65 |
| Zahra King | 0.9 | 48% | −3 | 65–65 |
| Theresa Hagans Jr. | 0.9 | 48% | −3 | 65–65 |
| Nyadieng Yiech | 2.5 | 61% | +10 | 64–66 |
| Dasha Biriuk | 2.1 | 59% | +8 | 64–66 |
| T'yana Todd | 1.6 | 57% | +6 | 64–66 |
| Maya Foz | 1.3 | 56% | +5 | 64–66 |
Change is in SMU's win chance, in points. Scores read Grand Canyon, then SMU. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Grand Canyon 2-0WW
- Nov 9W 81-74vs OregonCovered +9.5 · Over 137.5
- Nov 4W 77-55vs Jackson St
- Last 2
- 2–0, scoring 79.0 and allowing 64.5
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
SMU 4-0WWWW
- Nov 11W 69-50vs Long Island
- Nov 8W 78-65vs East Texas A&M
- Nov 5W 66-54vs Hampton
- Nov 3W 72-36vs Le Moyne
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 71.2 and allowing 51.2
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Grand Canyon | SMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 94.5 123rd | 88.1 216th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 90.6 117th | 88.3 82nd |
| Possessions a game | 73.2 84th | 72.8 110th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 45.4% 180th | 45.1% 201st |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.4% 116th | 43.8% 77th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 23.2% 157th | 26.0% 323rd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.1% 163rd | 36.7% 36th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.26 9th | 0.16 360th |
The widest gap: Grand Canyon's defense (117th) against SMU's offense (216th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Grand Canyon 31, SMU 31
- First-half margin
- SMU by 0.2
- First-half points, both teams
- 61.7
- Projected second half
- Grand Canyon 34, SMU 34
- Second-half points, both teams
- 68.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Grand Canyon, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 46.0 scored, 25.0 allowed
- SMU, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 35.2 scored, 26.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Grand Canyon
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dasha BiriukG | 29 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 4+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 42% | |||||
| Nyadieng YiechF | 29 | 13.1 | 7.1 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 15+ pts 37% · 7+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 54% | |||||
| T'yana ToddG | 27 | 9.7 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
| Maya FozG | 26 | 10.6 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Jana SallmanC | 24 | 10.6 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 8+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 39% | |||||
| Chloe MannG | 22 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 2+ ast 55% · 1+ threes 53% | |||||
| Ashlynn ChlarsonC | 13 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 31% · 3+ reb 57% | |||||
| Ines ZouniaG | 12 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 31% · 2+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 35% | |||||
SMU
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Theresa Hagans Jr.G | 31 | 16.6 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 1.7 |
| 15+ pts 58% · 4+ reb 52% · 4+ ast 47% | |||||
| Mailien RolfG | 24 | 4.8 | 3.7 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 4+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 38% | |||||
| Adja KaneF | 23 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 57% · 6+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 39% | |||||
| Grace EzebiloF | 22 | 5.8 | 9.2 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 9+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 22% | |||||
| Shania JamesG | 21 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 40% · 2+ ast 62% | |||||
| Zahra KingG | 20 | 8.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 2+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 58% | |||||
| Camille NesmithC | 19 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 5+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 19% | |||||
| Zoe OsbyF | 17 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 47% to play · 5+ pts 30% · 3+ reb 48% | |||||
Missed the last game: Zoe Osby (20 min a game).
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…