Bryant at Holy Cross
Women's · Monday, November 16, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at Hart Center Arena. Bryant our rank 157 · 4-0; Holy Cross our rank 196 · 3-1.
Who will win Bryant vs Holy Cross?
The model gives Holy Cross a 50% chance to beat Bryant, with a projected score of Holy Cross 59, Bryant 59.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BachmannG · 29 min | 13.1 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 15+ 37% | |
| EddyG · 35 min | 11.3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 10+ 58% | |
| PhiriG · 33 min | 9.7 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 10+ 46% | |
| McDermottG · 28 min | 7.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 5+ 65% | |
| ManciniG · 36 min | 12.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 10+ 65% | |
| McNamaraF · 34 min | 11.5 | 5.7 | 1.5 | 10+ 59% | |
| ScottF · 29 min | 10.7 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 10+ 53% | |
| WedemeyerG · 26 min | 8.7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 10+ 39% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Janie Bachmann: Bryant 55%Holy Cross 45%
The white mark is the call with her: Holy Cross 50%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Holy Cross without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janie Bachmann | 1.4 | 45% | −5 | 59–58 |
| Kendall Eddy | 1.0 | 46% | −4 | 59–58 |
| Emma Lizotte | 0.7 | 47% | −3 | 59–58 |
| Nia Scott | 2.3 | 59% | +9 | 58–60 |
| Mia Mancini | 1.4 | 55% | +5 | 58–59 |
| Izzy Adams | 0.9 | 53% | +3 | 58–59 |
| Cameron McNamara | 0.7 | 53% | +3 | 58–59 |
Change is in Holy Cross's win chance, in points. Scores read Bryant, then Holy Cross. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Bryant 4-0WWWW
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 64.0 and allowing 45.2
Holy Cross 3-1WWLW
- Last 4
- 3–1, scoring 58.0 and allowing 56.8
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Bryant | Holy Cross | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 88.3 212th | 86.0 252nd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 89.9 105th | 92.5 142nd |
| Possessions a game | 69.9 341st | 70.7 307th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.0% 91st | 44.8% 220th |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.9% 148th | 42.8% 36th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.0% 228th | 21.2% 27th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.3% 206th | 27.4% 360th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 182nd | 0.16 362nd |
The widest gap: Bryant's defense (105th) against Holy Cross's offense (252nd), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Bryant 28, Holy Cross 28
- First-half margin
- Tied
- First-half points, both teams
- 55.6
- Projected second half
- Bryant 31, Holy Cross 31
- Second-half points, both teams
- 61.7
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Bryant, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 35.5 scored, 23.8 allowed
- Holy Cross, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 4 · 25.0 scored, 28.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Bryant
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mia ManciniG | 36 | 12.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 1.8 |
| 10+ pts 65% · 5+ reb 47% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Cameron McNamaraF | 34 | 11.5 | 5.7 | 1.5 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 59% · 6+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 43% | |||||
| Izzy AdamsG | 32 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 3.0 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 48% · 3+ ast 54% | |||||
| Nia ScottF | 29 | 10.7 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 53% · 8+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Martina BobaG | 29 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 2.2 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Genevive WedemeyerG | 26 | 8.7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 3+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
Holy Cross
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah GriffinG | 36 | 5.9 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 6+ reb 47% · 3+ ast 44% | |||||
| Kendall EddyG | 35 | 11.3 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 58% · 3+ reb 44% · 4+ ast 45% | |||||
| Colleen PhiriG | 33 | 9.7 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 46% · 5+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 40% | |||||
| Janie BachmannG | 29 | 13.1 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 15+ pts 37% · 6+ reb 52% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Brianna McDermottG | 28 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 3+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 44% | |||||
| Emma LizotteF | 19 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 4+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 20% | |||||
| Abigail CasperF | 17 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 3+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…