Duquesne at Kent State
Women's · Saturday, November 14, 2026, 1:00 PM ET at M.A.C. Center. Duquesne our rank 203 · 2-1; Kent State our rank 189 · 0-2.
Who will win Duquesne vs Kent State?
The model gives Kent State a 68% chance to beat Duquesne, with a projected score of Kent State 71, Duquesne 65.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KlattF · 31 min | 13.2 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 15+ 38% | |
| HauserG · 27 min | 12.1 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 10+ 63% | |
| RismillerC · 29 min | 11.9 | 7.3 | 0.8 | 10+ 62% | |
| LuukkonenG · 33 min | 9.4 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 10+ 44% | |
| MooreG · 30 min | 17.3 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 15+ 62% | |
| ViegasG · 32 min | 14.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 15+ 48% | |
| RippeyG · 20 min | 8.6 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 10+ 38% | |
| OrenG · 30 min | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 5+ 65% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Emory Klatt: Duquesne 40%Kent State 60%
The white mark is the call with her: Kent State 68%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Kent State without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory Klatt | 2.8 | 60% | −8 | 67–70 |
| Riley Rismiller | 1.8 | 63% | −5 | 66–70 |
| Corynne Hauser | 0.6 | 67% | −1 | 66–71 |
| Dunja Zecevic | 0.7 | 70% | +2 | 65–72 |
Change is in Kent State's win chance, in points. Scores read Duquesne, then Kent State. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Duquesne 2-1LWW
- Last 3
- 2–1, scoring 77.0 and allowing 78.7
Kent State 0-2LL
- Nov 7L 58-61at N Kentucky
- Nov 2L 78-89vs Troy
- Last 2
- 0–2, scoring 68.0 and allowing 75.0
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Duquesne | Kent State | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 88.8 199th | 88.2 213th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 96.6 231st | 94.0 172nd |
| Possessions a game | 73.5 71st | 73.5 71st |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.6% 237th | 43.8% 287th |
| Opponents' shooting | 46.6% 247th | 46.6% 247th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.5% 263rd | 22.7% 116th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.9% 127th | 29.6% 332nd |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 261st | 0.24 35th |
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Duquesne 31, Kent State 34
- First-half margin
- Kent State by 3.4
- First-half points, both teams
- 64.7
- Projected second half
- Duquesne 35, Kent State 37
- Second-half points, both teams
- 71.8
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Duquesne, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 3 · 41.3 scored, 36.7 allowed
- Kent State, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 2 · 33.0 scored, 37.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Duquesne
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carla ViegasG | 32 | 14.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 3.8 |
| 15+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 40% · 4+ threes 48% | |||||
| Nadia MooreG | 30 | 17.3 | 3.9 | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 15+ pts 62% · 4+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Ayala OrenG | 30 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 3.3 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 5+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
| Gabby Grantham-MedleyG | 24 | 6.9 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 2+ ast 53% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Raevin WashingtonF | 21 | 6.1 | 5.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 57% · 6+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 17% | |||||
| De'Naya RippeyG | 20 | 8.6 | 5.8 | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 38% · 6+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 39% | |||||
| Amaya RobinsonG | 17 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 2+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 60% | |||||
| Maja RohkohlC | 16 | 2.7 | 5.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 22% · 6+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 16% | |||||
Kent State
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sini LuukkonenG | 33 | 9.4 | 4.1 | 2.1 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 59% | |||||
| Emory KlattF | 31 | 13.2 | 8.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| 15+ pts 38% · 8+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 33% | |||||
| Riley RismillerC | 29 | 11.9 | 7.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| 40% to play · 10+ pts 62% · 7+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 20% | |||||
| Corynne HauserG | 27 | 12.1 | 3.5 | 3.0 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 63% · 3+ ast 55% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Talia HarrisG | 27 | 8.3 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 3+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 61% | |||||
| Whitney StaffordG | 25 | 7.9 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 40% | |||||
| Maddie KiperG | 18 | 3.8 | 2.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Anna CampanelliG | 16 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 34% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…