Probable Stats
Menu

Furman at Campbell

Women's · Saturday, November 14, 2026, 2:00 PM ET at John W. Pope Jr. Convocation Center. Furman our rank 206 · 2-2; Campbell our rank 335 · 0-4.

Who will win Furman vs Campbell?

Logged before tip-off; never changed after it.

The model gives Furman a 71% chance to beat Campbell, with a projected score of Furman 67, Campbell 60.

To winFurman 71%Campbell 29%
Projected score67–60Furman, then Campbell
Margin6.9Furman · no line posted
Total127.1no line posted
First half32–28Furman ahead 64%
Furman by 40by 30by 20by 10Evenby 10Campbell by 20Model: Furman by 6.9Furman by 40by 20EvenCampbell by 20Model: Furman by 6.9

Half of games like thisFour in five

Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.9% of the time in 7,564 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.

Players to watch

our projection, not a sportsbook's
PlayerPtsRebAstLast gamesChance of
Furman
CoyleF · 28 min17.47.81.215+ 63%
ErvinG · 27 min16.12.91.415+ 55%
McGowensG · 29 min9.94.43.010+ 48%
PearlG · 24 min6.61.72.55+ 61%
Campbell
FeltonG · 35 min14.26.51.415+ 44%
SchneebergF · 26 min9.86.31.110+ 47%
PredojevicF · 26 min6.74.81.35+ 62%
DavisG · 17 min5.11.91.05+ 47%

Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line

The game without one player

Pick a regular to sit her

Without Clare Coyle: Furman 66%Campbell 34%

The white mark is the call with her: Furman 71%.

PlayerPoints a game she addsFurman without herChangeProjected score
Furman
Clare Coyle1.966%−566–61
Alyssa Ervin0.869%−267–61

Change is in Furman's win chance, in points. Scores read Furman, then Campbell. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.

Play-by-play

    Team numbers

    Form

    Each team's last five before this game

    Furman 2-2LWWL

    1. Nov 10L 56-74at Auburn
    2. Nov 6W 77-38vs Southern Wesleyan
    3. Nov 4W 106-48vs Erskine
    4. Nov 2L 54-80at South Florida
    Last 4
    2–2, scoring 73.2 and allowing 60.0

    Campbell 0-4LLLL

    1. Nov 11L 56-83vs Radford
    2. Nov 8L 43-80at Davidson
    3. Nov 4L 45-80at NC State
    4. Nov 2L 47-62vs Austin Peay
    Last 4
    0–4, scoring 47.8 and allowing 76.2

    The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.

    Offense against defense

    Adjusted for opponents · rank of 363
    FurmanCampbell
    Points scored per 100 possessions87.0 231st80.7 309th
    Points allowed per 10095.0 194th102.9 338th
    Possessions a game73.2 84th69.4 357th
    Shooting (effective field-goal %)44.1% 271st44.9% 217th
    Opponents' shooting46.0% 213th48.2% 321st
    Turnovers, share of possessions23.1% 149th30.2% 361st
    Offensive rebounds, share of misses31.3% 260th34.1% 116th
    Free throws per shot0.24 34th0.19 291st

    The widest gap: Furman's defense (194th) against Campbell's offense (309th), of 363 teams.

    First half

    Projected from the full-game numbers

    Ahead at halftime

    Projected halftime score
    Furman 32, Campbell 28
    First-half margin
    Furman by 4.0
    First-half points, both teams
    60.3
    Projected second half
    Furman 35, Campbell 32
    Second-half points, both teams
    66.8
    Tied at the half
    4%
    Furman, first halves so far
    Led 2 of 4 · 37.8 scored, 28.8 allowed
    Campbell, first halves so far
    Led 0 of 4 · 21.0 scored, 42.8 allowed

    Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard

    Player projections

    Each player's projected line for this game

    Furman

    PlayerMinPtsRebAst3s
    Raina McGowensG299.94.43.00.2
    10+ pts 48% · 5+ reb 43% · 3+ ast 54%
    Clare CoyleF2817.47.81.20.1
    15+ pts 63% · 8+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 33%
    Alyssa ErvinG2716.12.91.41.6
    15+ pts 55% · 3+ reb 52% · 2+ threes 44%
    Sophia PearlG246.61.72.51.3
    5+ pts 61% · 2+ reb 46% · 3+ ast 44%
    Nariah NelsonG226.32.91.10.5
    5+ pts 59% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 40%
    Emma BriggsF216.05.81.00.3
    5+ pts 56% · 6+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 28%
    Ciara AlexanderG184.43.80.60.1
    31% to play · 5+ pts 40% · 4+ reb 50%
    Ava SawiG164.91.70.60.4
    5+ pts 45% · 2+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 30%

    Missed the last game: Ciara Alexander (18 min a game).

    Campbell

    PlayerMinPtsRebAst3s
    Jasmine FeltonG3514.26.51.41.1
    15+ pts 44% · 7+ reb 45% · 2+ ast 38%
    Jessica WoodsG283.33.01.30.3
    5+ pts 28% · 3+ reb 52% · 2+ ast 37%
    Genesis SchneebergF269.86.31.10.1
    10+ pts 47% · 6+ reb 56% · 2+ ast 28%
    Hana PredojevicF266.74.81.30.5
    5+ pts 62% · 5+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 36%
    Emerson ThompsonG193.22.21.10.4
    5+ pts 27% · 2+ reb 59% · 2+ ast 29%
    Amit ArieliG173.71.80.90.7
    5+ pts 33% · 2+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 45%
    Kiaya DavisG175.11.91.00.6
    5+ pts 47% · 2+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 41%
    Mikayla TabornF152.33.00.50.1
    5+ pts 18% · 3+ reb 53%

    Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done

    Why the model sees it this way

    The game in numbers

    The matchup

    More games on Sat, Nov 14

    All games
    1. 2 PMprojected 62-70Rhode Island at St John's, women's: game page
    2. 2 PMprojected 69-67Wisconsin at Green Bay, women's: game page
    3. 3 PMprojected 73-62California at Santa Barbara, women's: game page
    4. 4 PMprojected 74-65North Carolina at Penn, women's: game page
    5. 4:30 PMprojected 72-62Nebraska vs Kansas, women's: game page
    6. 6 PMprojected 69-71Northwestern vs App State, women's: game page