Who will win Stetson vs Clemson?
The model gives Clemson a 99% chance to beat Stetson, with a projected score of Clemson 76, Stetson 46.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 96.1% of the time in 10,929 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Clemson | |||||
| MooreG · 30 min | 11.8 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 10+ 61% | |
| NelsonG · 27 min | 10.5 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 10+ 52% | |
| ClarkeF · 24 min | 9.3 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 10+ 43% | |
| HendersonG · 24 min | 8.1 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 10+ 34% | |
 Stetson | |||||
| LocatelliG · 27 min | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 5+ 65% | |
| NievesG · 22 min | 6.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 5+ 62% | |
| Garcia-Escribano PozoF · 27 min | 6.3 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 5+ 59% | |
| Nmecha AnyaeleF · 23 min | 4.0 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 5+ 36% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Mia Moore: Stetson 2%Clemson 98%
The white mark is the call with her: Clemson 99%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Clemson without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clemson | ||||
| Mia Moore | 4.0 | 98% | −1 | 48–74 |
| Taliyah Henderson | 3.2 | 99% | 0 | 47–74 |
| Mackenzie Nelson | 2.9 | 99% | 0 | 47–74 |
| Rusne Augustinaite | 2.4 | 99% | 0 | 47–74 |
Change is in Clemson's win chance, in points. Scores read Stetson, then Clemson. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Stetson 1-3WLLL
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 51.5 and allowing 70.2
Clemson 3-1WWWL
- Nov 12L 44-65vs South CarolinaCovered +26.5 · Under 133.5
- Nov 8W 72-44vs UNC Greensboro
- Nov 5W 76-57vs ETSU
- Nov 2W 68-47vs Radford
- Last 4
- 3–1, scoring 65.0 and allowing 53.2
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Stetson | Clemson | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 80.0 319th | 101.1 67th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 95.3 205th | 83.4 49th |
| Possessions a game | 72.0 179th | 69.6 350th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 41.7% 343rd | 45.7% 158th |
| Opponents' shooting | 46.2% 227th | 44.7% 134th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 26.1% 326th | 23.1% 143rd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.2% 308th | 31.1% 273rd |
| Free throws per shot | 0.19 305th | 0.20 227th |
The widest gap: Clemson's defense (49th) against Stetson's offense (319th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Stetson 20, Clemson 37
- First-half margin
- Clemson by 17.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 57.5
- Projected second half
- Stetson 26, Clemson 38
- Second-half points, both teams
- 63.8
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Stetson, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 25.7 scored, 34.3 allowed
- Clemson, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 29.0 scored, 26.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Stetson
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Candela Garcia-Escribano PozoF | 27 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 3+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 31% | |||||
| Sophie LocatelliG | 27 | 6.9 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 2+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
| Favour Nmecha AnyaeleF | 23 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 36% · 5+ reb 45% | |||||
| Jorah EppleyG | 22 | 3.7 | 1.9 | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 2+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 64% | |||||
| Desireck NievesG | 22 | 6.6 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 62% | |||||
| Addison GodbyG | 17 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 2+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 19% | |||||
| Cici DriessenG | 16 | 3.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 31% · 2+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 25% | |||||
| Raven LeXanderF | 15 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 15% · 2+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 15% | |||||
Clemson
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mia MooreG | 30 | 11.8 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 61% · 4+ reb 54% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| Mackenzie NelsonG | 27 | 10.5 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 51% · 5+ ast 47% | |||||
| Edie ClarkeF | 24 | 9.3 | 6.6 | 1.9 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 7+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 54% | |||||
| Taliyah HendersonG | 24 | 8.1 | 4.2 | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 4+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Rusne AugustinaiteG | 24 | 6.9 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ threes 45% | |||||
| Holland HarrisG | 14 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
| Jenna LawrenceF | 13 | 7.4 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 1.3 |
| 5+ pts 68% · 3+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 65% | |||||
| Julia ScottF | 13 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 4+ reb 41% · 1+ threes 18% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…