Manhattan at Long Island
Women's · Thursday, November 19, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Brooklyn Athletic Center. Manhattan our rank 295 · 1-3; Long Island our rank 345 · 0-4.
Who will win Manhattan vs Long Island?
The model gives Manhattan a 63% chance to beat Long Island University, with a projected score of Manhattan 63, Long Island 59.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MurtaghG · 33 min | 13.0 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 15+ 37% | |
| Grgicevich LasseyG · 30 min | 9.3 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 10+ 43% | |
| BaumgarteF · 31 min | 8.9 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 10+ 40% | |
| HarperG · 24 min | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 5+ 63% | |
| WilliamsG · 32 min | 14.0 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 15+ 43% | |
| NunezF · 35 min | 11.4 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 10+ 58% | |
| PoindujourG · 24 min | 6.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 5+ 58% | |
| HuskeyG · 21 min | 5.9 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 5+ 55% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Manhattan 1-3WLLL
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 57.2 and allowing 56.2
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Manhattan | Long Island | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 79.0 322nd | 77.0 342nd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 95.5 209th | 103.0 340th |
| Possessions a game | 72.0 179th | 72.3 148th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.7% 231st | 46.4% 122nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.4% 119th | 44.4% 116th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.0% 219th | 29.4% 357th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.0% 317th | 34.4% 104th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.19 316th | 0.18 332nd |
The widest gap: Manhattan's defense (209th) against Long Island's offense (342nd), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Manhattan 30, Long Island 28
- First-half margin
- Manhattan by 2.3
- First-half points, both teams
- 57.9
- Projected second half
- Manhattan 33, Long Island 31
- Second-half points, both teams
- 64.3
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Manhattan, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 4 · 26.0 scored, 30.8 allowed
- Long Island, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 4 · 24.8 scored, 38.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Manhattan
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taylah MurtaghG | 33 | 13.0 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.9 |
| 15+ pts 37% · 4+ reb 48% · 2+ threes 51% | |||||
| Amanda BaumgarteF | 31 | 8.9 | 6.5 | 2.2 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 40% · 7+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 62% | |||||
| Olivia Grgicevich LasseyG | 30 | 9.3 | 3.6 | 2.5 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 43% · 4+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Celeste HarperG | 24 | 6.8 | 2.2 | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 2+ reb 58% · 2+ ast 53% | |||||
| Laura RingF | 22 | 6.7 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 5+ reb 43% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
| Laia Izquierdo AltimiraF | 18 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 39% · 4+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
| Ana ZesatiF | 16 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 4+ reb 42% · 2+ ast 23% | |||||
| Cortney HowellF | 14 | 3.9 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 43% | |||||
Long Island
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leila NunezF | 35 | 11.4 | 4.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| 10+ pts 58% · 4+ reb 54% · 2+ threes 53% | |||||
| Janessa WilliamsG | 32 | 14.0 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 43% · 8+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 53% | |||||
| Camille WileyG | 30 | 4.6 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 58% | |||||
| Teriyah McFaddenG | 28 | 5.5 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Fabiana PoindujourG | 24 | 6.2 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 58% · 2+ reb 60% · 2+ ast 50% | |||||
| Laura MolnarovaF | 21 | 5.5 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 51% · 4+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 33% | |||||
| Sydney HuskeyG | 21 | 5.9 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 55% · 3+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
| Kylie MorrisF | 12 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 25% · 3+ reb 44% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…