App State at Wake Forest
Women's · Thursday, November 19, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at LJVM Coliseum. App State our rank 121 · 3-0; Wake Forest our rank 112 · 4-0.
Who will win App State vs Wake Forest?
The model gives Wake Forest a 65% chance to beat App State, with a projected score of Wake Forest 67, App State 62.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CarterG · 30 min | 12.0 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 10+ 62% | |
| SorbyeG · 30 min | 10.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 10+ 51% | |
| NwudeG · 16 min | 7.7 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 10+ 31% | |
| HollandG · 19 min | 7.3 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 5+ 67% | |
| WilliamsG · 29 min | 12.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 10+ 65% | |
| MitchellG · 29 min | 12.0 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 10+ 62% | |
| Defne AtliF · 26 min | 9.8 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 10+ 47% | |
| AtchisonG · 23 min | 9.5 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 10+ 45% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Mary Carter: App State 42%Wake Forest 58%
The white mark is the call with her: Wake Forest 65%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Wake Forest without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary Carter | 2.2 | 58% | −7 | 63–66 |
| Breauna Ware | 1.6 | 60% | −5 | 63–66 |
| Aurora Sorbye | 1.3 | 61% | −4 | 63–67 |
| Opal Bird | 1.1 | 62% | −3 | 63–67 |
| Joi Williams | 2.2 | 71% | +6 | 61–68 |
| Raven Preston | 2.0 | 71% | +6 | 61–68 |
| Daisia Mitchell | 1.6 | 70% | +5 | 62–68 |
| Addie Biel | 1.0 | 68% | +3 | 62–68 |
Change is in Wake Forest's win chance, in points. Scores read App State, then Wake Forest. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
App State 3-0WWW
- Nov 11W 71-67at Davidson
- Nov 4W 107-43vs Montreat
- Nov 2W 74-62at E Michigan
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 84.0 and allowing 57.3
Wake Forest 4-0WWWW
- Nov 12W 65-48vs UNC Wilmington
- Nov 8W 77-51vs Mercer
- Nov 5W 85-53vs Presbyterian
- Nov 2W 65-58vs SC Upstate
- Last 4
- 4–0, scoring 73.0 and allowing 52.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| App State | Wake Forest | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 94.1 125th | 93.6 133rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 90.7 119th | 89.4 98th |
| Possessions a game | 71.0 285th | 72.1 164th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 49.4% 20th | 47.2% 85th |
| Opponents' shooting | 44.3% 108th | 43.3% 55th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.1% 234th | 23.5% 185th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 33.7% 140th | 29.2% 341st |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 280th | 0.22 115th |
First half
- Projected halftime score
- App State 29, Wake Forest 32
- First-half margin
- Wake Forest by 2.8
- First-half points, both teams
- 61.4
- Projected second half
- App State 33, Wake Forest 35
- Second-half points, both teams
- 68.1
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- App State, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 43.0 scored, 28.3 allowed
- Wake Forest, first halves so far
- Led 4 of 4 · 40.8 scored, 28.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
App State
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daisia MitchellG | 29 | 12.0 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 4+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 61% | |||||
| Joi WilliamsG | 29 | 12.5 | 3.5 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
| 10+ pts 65% · 3+ ast 50% · 2+ threes 50% | |||||
| Feryal Defne AtliF | 26 | 9.8 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 6+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 24% | |||||
| Raven PrestonG | 26 | 8.5 | 5.6 | 2.2 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 6+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 61% | |||||
| Jadyn AtchisonG | 23 | 9.5 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 3+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Torin RogersG | 22 | 6.5 | 2.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 50% | |||||
| Jayden McBrideG | 21 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Addie BielF | 13 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 54% · 3+ reb 54% | |||||
Wake Forest
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mary CarterG | 30 | 12.0 | 4.8 | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 5+ reb 50% · 2+ threes 41% | |||||
| Aurora SorbyeG | 30 | 10.4 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| 10+ pts 51% · 2+ reb 60% · 3+ ast 44% | |||||
| Opal BirdF | 26 | 4.7 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 4+ reb 45% · 3+ ast 40% | |||||
| Breauna WareG | 25 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 2+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 57% | |||||
| Oshauna HollandG | 19 | 7.3 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 67% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 23% | |||||
| Grace GalbavyG | 17 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 2+ reb 60% · 1+ threes 35% | |||||
| Helena DanielewiczF | 16 | 4.6 | 2.8 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 24% | |||||
| Adora NwudeG | 16 | 7.7 | 2.1 | 1.3 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 2+ reb 56% · 2+ ast 36% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…