Campbell at Norfolk St
Women's · Friday, November 20, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at Joseph G. Echols Hall. Campbell our rank 335 · 0-4; Norfolk St our rank 304 · 1-3.
Who will win Campbell vs Norfolk St?
The model gives Norfolk State a 73% chance to beat Campbell, with a projected score of Norfolk St 65, Campbell 58.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.9% of the time in 7,564 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PrackettF · 15 min | 8.5 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 10+ 37% | |
| GarrettG · 33 min | 8.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 10+ 36% | |
| DavisF · 22 min | 8.0 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 10+ 33% | |
| WorleyG · 32 min | 7.6 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 5+ 70% | |
| FeltonG · 35 min | 13.8 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 15+ 41% | |
| SchneebergF · 26 min | 9.5 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 10+ 44% | |
| PredojevicF · 26 min | 6.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 5+ 61% | |
| DavisG · 17 min | 4.9 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 5+ 46% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Campbell 0-4LLLL
- Last 4
- 0–4, scoring 47.8 and allowing 76.2
Norfolk St 1-3LWLL
- Nov 12L 23-85vs DukeDidn't cover +38.5 · Under 131.5
- Nov 8L 56-72vs Penn
- Nov 4W 62-51vs District of Columbia
- Nov 2L 62-63vs Virginia State
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 50.8 and allowing 67.8
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Campbell | Norfolk St | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 80.7 309th | 80.5 313th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 102.9 338th | 97.9 254th |
| Possessions a game | 69.4 357th | 72.1 164th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.9% 217th | 41.1% 353rd |
| Opponents' shooting | 48.2% 321st | 48.7% 337th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 30.2% 361st | 25.2% 291st |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 34.1% 116th | 28.4% 351st |
| Free throws per shot | 0.19 291st | 0.21 166th |
The widest gap: Norfolk St's defense (254th) against Campbell's offense (309th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Campbell 27, Norfolk St 31
- First-half margin
- Norfolk St by 4.4
- First-half points, both teams
- 58.2
- Projected second half
- Campbell 31, Norfolk St 34
- Second-half points, both teams
- 64.5
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Campbell, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 4 · 21.0 scored, 42.8 allowed
- Norfolk St, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 4 · 21.2 scored, 35.5 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Campbell
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine FeltonG | 35 | 13.8 | 6.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| 15+ pts 41% · 6+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 61% | |||||
| Jessica WoodsG | 28 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 27% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 35% | |||||
| Genesis SchneebergF | 26 | 9.5 | 6.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 6+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 27% | |||||
| Hana PredojevicF | 26 | 6.5 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 5+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 35% | |||||
| Emerson ThompsonG | 19 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 26% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 28% | |||||
| Amit ArieliG | 17 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Kiaya DavisG | 17 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 46% · 2+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Mikayla TabornF | 15 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 18% · 3+ reb 51% | |||||
Norfolk St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sana'a GarrettG | 33 | 8.3 | 3.8 | 3.5 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 4+ reb 50% · 4+ ast 45% | |||||
| Cire WorleyG | 32 | 7.6 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 5+ pts 70% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 51% | |||||
| Asia KeelsG | 28 | 5.3 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 50% · 3+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| LeAire NicksC | 24 | 6.2 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 58% · 5+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 16% | |||||
| Alexis DavisF | 22 | 8.0 | 6.9 | 0.8 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 33% · 7+ reb 50% · 2+ ast 21% | |||||
| Niylia WilkinsG | 18 | 4.5 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 79% to play · 5+ pts 41% · 2+ reb 60% · 1+ threes 35% | |||||
| Clemisha PrackettF | 15 | 8.5 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 5+ reb 54% | |||||
| Elise McClainG | 11 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 17% · 2+ reb 30% · 1+ threes 37% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…