AR-Pine Bluff at UL Monroe
Women's · Monday, November 16, 2026, 6:00 PM ET at b1Bank Fant Coliseum. AR-Pine Bluff our rank 301 · 1-3; UL Monroe our rank 263 · 1-2.
Who will win AR-Pine Bluff vs UL Monroe?
The model gives UL Monroe a 71% chance to beat Arkansas-Pine Bluff, with a projected score of UL Monroe 69, AR-Pine Bluff 62.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.9% of the time in 7,564 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CulverG · 17 min | 11.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 10+ 57% | |
| HuntG · 27 min | 9.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 10+ 42% | |
| LindseyG · 21 min | 7.1 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 5+ 66% | |
| ScottG · 23 min | 6.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 5+ 64% | |
| BowenG · 29 min | 15.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 15+ 50% | |
| PellyG · 28 min | 13.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 15+ 40% | |
| JacksonG · 27 min | 11.0 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 10+ 56% | |
| TaylorF · 24 min | 7.5 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 5+ 69% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
AR-Pine Bluff 1-3LLWL
- Nov 12L 90-95at Arkansas
- Nov 9W 84-50vs Arkansas Baptist
- Nov 4L 47-66at Tarleton St
- Nov 2L 54-77at Texas A&M
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 68.8 and allowing 72.0
UL Monroe 1-2LWL
- Nov 9L 49-61vs C Arkansas
- Nov 5W 106-26vs Centenary (LA)
- Nov 2L 46-57at Ohio
- Last 3
- 1–2, scoring 67.0 and allowing 48.0
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| AR-Pine Bluff | UL Monroe | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 86.2 246th | 81.7 298th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 103.4 341st | 95.0 193rd |
| Possessions a game | 72.3 148th | 72.7 115th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 44.8% 225th | 41.5% 346th |
| Opponents' shooting | 45.6% 179th | 44.9% 145th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 22.7% 111th | 24.8% 274th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 32.6% 190th | 33.2% 160th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 181st | 0.23 58th |
The widest gap: UL Monroe's defense (193rd) against AR-Pine Bluff's offense (246th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- AR-Pine Bluff 29, UL Monroe 33
- First-half margin
- UL Monroe by 4.1
- First-half points, both teams
- 62.5
- Projected second half
- AR-Pine Bluff 33, UL Monroe 36
- Second-half points, both teams
- 69.4
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- AR-Pine Bluff, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 4 · 33.5 scored, 35.8 allowed
- UL Monroe, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 3 · 33.7 scored, 23.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
AR-Pine Bluff
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiya BowenG | 29 | 15.2 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 15+ pts 50% · 2+ ast 56% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Jailah PellyG | 28 | 13.6 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 0.6 |
| 15+ pts 40% · 4+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
| Jakyra JacksonG | 27 | 11.0 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 56% · 5+ reb 44% · 3+ ast 49% | |||||
| Jasmine DavisG | 26 | 5.2 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 48% · 3+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Yasmyn PalmerC | 25 | 6.3 | 4.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 59% · 5+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 15% | |||||
| Tyra TaylorF | 24 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 69% · 8+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Ruth BanjokoF | 20 | 2.9 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 24% · 4+ reb 44% · 2+ ast 17% | |||||
| Parc LigginsG | 15 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 28% · 2+ reb 40% · 1+ threes 23% | |||||
UL Monroe
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylee HuntG | 27 | 9.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.5 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 3+ reb 45% · 3+ ast 48% | |||||
| Nevaeh ScottG | 23 | 6.9 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 64% · 2+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 49% | |||||
| Summer FaleafaF | 23 | 6.0 | 5.4 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 56% · 6+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 42% | |||||
| Lea NadolnyG | 22 | 5.3 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 3+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Kayla LindseyG | 21 | 7.1 | 4.7 | 1.6 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 5+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 45% | |||||
| Erin HenryG | 20 | 6.2 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 58% · 2+ ast 47% · 1+ threes 49% | |||||
| Nuria MucongoNA | 17 | 3.3 | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 28% · 4+ reb 57% · 1+ threes 27% | |||||
| Aiyanna CulverG | 17 | 11.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 57% · 2+ reb 44% · 2+ threes 47% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…