N Dakota St at UT Rio Grande
Women's · Thursday, November 19, 2026, 7:30 PM ET at UTRGV Fieldhouse. N Dakota St our rank 85 · 1-3; UT Rio Grande our rank 223 · 1-3.
Who will win N Dakota St vs UT Rio Grande?
The model gives North Dakota State a 80% chance to beat UT Rio Grande Valley, with a projected score of N Dakota St 72, UT Rio Grande 61.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 70–80% have been right 74.9% of the time in 7,564 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AspF · 33 min | 16.7 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 15+ 59% | |
| FrostG · 35 min | 13.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 15+ 38% | |
| SchillerG · 33 min | 10.6 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 10+ 52% | |
| HawkinsonG · 31 min | 8.5 | 4.8 | 2.9 | 10+ 37% | |
| McLaurinG · 28 min | 15.3 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 15+ 51% | |
| AarnioG · 34 min | 10.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 10+ 52% | |
| FimboF · 24 min | 6.5 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 5+ 61% | |
| WhitehairF · 16 min | 6.4 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 5+ 60% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Karrington Asp: N Dakota St 70%UT Rio Grande 30%
The white mark is the call with her: N Dakota St 80%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | N Dakota St without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karrington Asp | 3.8 | 70% | −10 | 70–63 |
| Marisa Frost | 3.1 | 72% | −8 | 70–63 |
| Jocelyn Schiller | 2.2 | 74% | −6 | 70–62 |
| Miriley Simon | 1.7 | 76% | −4 | 71–62 |
| Janette Aarnio | 0.6 | 81% | +1 | 72–61 |
Change is in N Dakota St's win chance, in points. Scores read N Dakota St, then UT Rio Grande. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
N Dakota St 1-3LWLL
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 65.8 and allowing 64.0
UT Rio Grande 1-3WLLL
- Nov 11L 59-76vs Abilene Chrstn
- Nov 8L 39-68at Kansas St
- Nov 6L 56-68at South Dakota
- Nov 2W 114-47vs Arlington Baptist
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 67.0 and allowing 64.8
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| N Dakota St | UT Rio Grande | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 99.2 80th | 88.8 204th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 90.0 107th | 98.6 264th |
| Possessions a game | 70.5 318th | 71.2 265th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 46.8% 105th | 42.8% 318th |
| Opponents' shooting | 45.8% 194th | 47.3% 290th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 24.1% 235th | 24.0% 223rd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 31.9% 234th | 31.3% 264th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.20 255th | 0.24 45th |
The widest gap: N Dakota St's offense (80th) against UT Rio Grande's defense (264th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- N Dakota St 34, UT Rio Grande 29
- First-half margin
- N Dakota St by 5.9
- First-half points, both teams
- 63.0
- Projected second half
- N Dakota St 37, UT Rio Grande 33
- Second-half points, both teams
- 69.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- N Dakota St, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 27.2 scored, 26.8 allowed
- UT Rio Grande, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 34.8 scored, 30.8 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
N Dakota St
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marisa FrostG | 35 | 13.2 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 15+ pts 38% · 2+ reb 51% · 2+ ast 62% | |||||
| Jocelyn SchillerG | 33 | 10.6 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 4+ reb 47% · 1+ threes 49% | |||||
| Karrington AspF | 33 | 16.7 | 7.3 | 1.4 | 0.7 |
| 15+ pts 59% · 7+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 48% | |||||
| Sophie HawkinsonG | 31 | 8.5 | 4.8 | 2.9 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 37% · 5+ reb 50% · 3+ ast 54% | |||||
| Miriley SimonF | 24 | 7.6 | 6.7 | 1.5 | 0.4 |
| 10+ pts 31% · 7+ reb 48% · 2+ ast 43% | |||||
| Elena LazarevicG | 17 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
| 31% to play · 5+ pts 46% · 2+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| McKenna JohnsonF | 14 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 3+ reb 55% | |||||
| Madelynn MunizG | 13 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 16% · 2+ reb 29% · 1+ threes 37% | |||||
Missed the last game: Elena Lazarevic (20 min a game).
UT Rio Grande
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janette AarnioG | 34 | 10.5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 4+ reb 42% · 3+ ast 53% | |||||
| Kamryn McLaurinG | 28 | 15.3 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 15+ pts 51% · 4+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 44% | |||||
| Lina FimboF | 24 | 6.5 | 7.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 7+ reb 55% · 1+ threes 47% | |||||
| Erin MaguireG | 19 | 4.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 2+ ast 40% · 1+ threes 46% | |||||
| Jessica BordersG | 18 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 43% · 2+ reb 61% · 1+ threes 42% | |||||
| Elise HorneF | 17 | 3.1 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 26% · 4+ reb 53% | |||||
| Gianna AngioletG | 16 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 2+ reb 31% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Rylie WhitehairF | 16 | 6.4 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 4+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…