Milwaukee at W Michigan
Women's · Friday, November 20, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at University Arena (MI). Milwaukee our rank 254 · 1-3; W Michigan our rank 274 · 0-2.
Who will win Milwaukee vs W Michigan?
The model gives Western Michigan a 57% chance to beat Milwaukee, with a projected score of W Michigan 61, Milwaukee 59.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 50–60% have been right 55.7% of the time in 7,540 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StarksG · 35 min | 13.9 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 15+ 42% | |
| VyvermanG · 28 min | 9.0 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 10+ 41% | |
| RansomG · 27 min | 8.1 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 10+ 34% | |
| CarlsonG · 35 min | 7.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5+ 66% | |
| PughF · 22 min | 10.4 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 10+ 51% | |
| MadiganG · 25 min | 9.6 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 10+ 45% | |
| FitzgibbonG · 25 min | 9.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 10+ 44% | |
| MurphyG · 26 min | 5.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 5+ 49% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Milwaukee 1-3LLLW
- Nov 12W 77-49vs North Dakota
- Nov 8L 57-63at SIUE
- Nov 5L 62-81at Saint Louis
- Nov 3L 60-64at Northwestern
- Last 4
- 1–3, scoring 64.0 and allowing 64.2
W Michigan 0-2LL
- Last 2
- 0–2, scoring 55.0 and allowing 64.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Milwaukee | W Michigan | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 86.5 241st | 78.9 323rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 99.2 287th | 93.7 168th |
| Possessions a game | 70.4 321st | 70.9 293rd |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.9% 52nd | 43.7% 292nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 45.4% 168th | 46.7% 255th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 21.7% 45th | 24.9% 279th |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 30.2% 309th | 25.0% 363rd |
| Free throws per shot | 0.16 358th | 0.22 134th |
The widest gap: W Michigan's defense (168th) against Milwaukee's offense (241st), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Milwaukee 28, W Michigan 29
- First-half margin
- W Michigan by 1.2
- First-half points, both teams
- 56.8
- Projected second half
- Milwaukee 31, W Michigan 32
- Second-half points, both teams
- 63.0
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Milwaukee, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 35.0 scored, 29.8 allowed
- W Michigan, first halves so far
- Led 1 of 2 · 27.5 scored, 32.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Milwaukee
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payton RechliczG | 31 | 4.5 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 4+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 60% | |||||
| Jaeda MurphyG | 26 | 5.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 0.4 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 3+ reb 42% · 3+ ast 52% | |||||
| Tierney MadiganG | 25 | 9.6 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 0.3 |
| 10+ pts 45% · 5+ reb 53% · 3+ ast 42% | |||||
| Madison FitzgibbonG | 25 | 9.4 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 44% · 2+ reb 55% · 2+ threes 46% | |||||
| Izzy PughF | 22 | 10.4 | 5.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 51% · 5+ reb 52% | |||||
| Kendall BarnesG | 14 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 29% · 2+ reb 61% · 2+ ast 28% | |||||
| Cece McNairC | 13 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 18% · 3+ reb 52% | |||||
| Rita GomesG | 12 | 5.2 | 1.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 49% · 2+ reb 44% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
W Michigan
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alli CarlsonG | 35 | 7.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 1.3 |
| 5+ pts 66% · 4+ reb 53% · 4+ ast 55% | |||||
| Kailey StarksG | 35 | 13.9 | 3.9 | 2.2 | 1.0 |
| 15+ pts 42% · 4+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Casey VyvermanG | 28 | 9.0 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| 10+ pts 41% · 3+ reb 51% · 2+ threes 38% | |||||
| Zuri RansomG | 27 | 8.1 | 3.8 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 34% · 4+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 37% | |||||
| Faith WisemanF | 22 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 4+ reb 53% · 1+ threes 21% | |||||
| Emily Van TimmerenF | 20 | 4.4 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 3+ reb 59% | |||||
| Alli HarnessG | 18 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 2+ reb 56% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…