South Carolina v UConn
Women's · Tuesday, November 24, 2026, 8:00 PM ET at Mohegan Sun Arena. South Carolina AP 1, our rank 1 · 3-0; UConn AP 4, our rank 2 · 3-1.
Who will win South Carolina vs UConn?
The model gives South Carolina a 61% chance to beat UConn, with a projected score of South Carolina 74, UConn 70.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 60–70% have been right 64.3% of the time in 7,507 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EdwardsF · 28 min | 14.4 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 15+ 45% | |
| JohnsonG · 27 min | 11.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 10+ 60% | |
| KittsF · 22 min | 10.4 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 10+ 51% | |
| MakeerG · 28 min | 9.9 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 10+ 48% | |
| StrongF · 30 min | 20.3 | 7.1 | 3.1 | 20+ 51% | |
| PopovicG · 29 min | 11.2 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 10+ 57% | |
| ArnoldG · 29 min | 8.8 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 10+ 39% | |
| QuinonezF · 23 min | 8.4 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 10+ 36% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Joyce Edwards: South Carolina 33%UConn 67%
The white mark is the call with her: South Carolina 61%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | South Carolina without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joyce Edwards | 8.6 | 33% | −28 | 69–75 |
| Jordan Lee | 6.8 | 39% | −22 | 70–74 |
| Agot Makeer | 6.6 | 39% | −22 | 70–74 |
| Tessa Johnson | 6.5 | 39% | −22 | 70–74 |
| Sarah Strong | 10.5 | 87% | +26 | 79–65 |
| KK Arnold | 7.1 | 80% | +19 | 77–67 |
| Blanca Quinonez | 6.1 | 78% | +17 | 77–67 |
| Ashlynn Shade | 5.0 | 75% | +14 | 76–68 |
Change is in South Carolina's win chance, in points. Scores read South Carolina, then UConn. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
South Carolina 3-0WWW
- Nov 12W 65-44at ClemsonDidn't cover −26.5 · Under 133.5
- Nov 8W 84-39vs North CarolinaCovered −16.5 · Under 144.5
- Nov 2W 101-93vs Maryland
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 83.3 and allowing 58.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 2 under
UConn 3-1WLWW
- Nov 12W 87-55at Ohio StateCovered −9.5 · Under 147.5
- Nov 8W 91-79vs IowaDidn't cover −13.5 · Over 138.5
- Nov 5L 66-77at MichiganDidn't cover −8.5 · Over 142.5
- Nov 2W 100-35vs Cornell
- Last 4
- 3–1, scoring 86.0 and allowing 61.5
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–2
- Totals, this season
- 2 over, 1 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| South Carolina | UConn | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 121.4 1st | 120.7 2nd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 66.2 1st | 69.5 2nd |
| Possessions a game | 73.3 76th | 73.7 57th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 48.2% 41st | 52.8% 1st |
| Opponents' shooting | 41.2% 14th | 44.2% 103rd |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 22.0% 65th | 22.0% 61st |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 37.9% 17th | 34.9% 84th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.25 22nd | 0.18 341st |
First half
- Projected halftime score
- South Carolina 35, UConn 33
- First-half margin
- South Carolina by 1.9
- First-half points, both teams
- 68.3
- Projected second half
- South Carolina 39, UConn 37
- Second-half points, both teams
- 75.7
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- South Carolina, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 3 · 41.7 scored, 23.7 allowed
- UConn, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 41.2 scored, 30.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
South Carolina
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan LeeG | 29 | 9.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 0.9 |
| 10+ pts 42% · 2+ ast 47% · 1+ threes 55% | |||||
| Joyce EdwardsF | 28 | 14.4 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 0.1 |
| 15+ pts 45% · 6+ reb 46% · 2+ ast 60% | |||||
| Agot MakeerG | 28 | 9.9 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 48% · 2+ ast 50% · 1+ threes 51% | |||||
| Tessa JohnsonG | 27 | 11.7 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.7 |
| 10+ pts 60% · 2+ ast 57% · 2+ threes 45% | |||||
| Chloe KittsF | 22 | 10.4 | 7.6 | 2.0 | 0.2 |
| 10+ pts 51% · 8+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Ashlyn WatkinsF | 17 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 33% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 18% | |||||
| Jerzy RobinsonG | 17 | 6.6 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 62% · 3+ reb 46% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
UConn
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah StrongF | 30 | 20.3 | 7.1 | 3.1 | 2.3 |
| 20+ pts 51% · 7+ reb 53% · 3+ ast 57% | |||||
| KK ArnoldG | 29 | 8.8 | 2.0 | 3.7 | 0.5 |
| 10+ pts 39% · 2+ reb 55% · 4+ ast 49% | |||||
| Jovana PopovicG | 29 | 11.2 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 57% · 4+ reb 49% · 1+ threes 56% | |||||
| Ashlynn ShadeG | 25 | 6.5 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 2+ ast 47% · 1+ threes 57% | |||||
| Blanca QuinonezF | 23 | 8.4 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 1.0 |
| 10+ pts 36% · 3+ reb 55% · 2+ ast 58% | |||||
| Olivia VukosaC | 21 | 6.4 | 6.8 | 1.4 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 60% · 7+ reb 49% · 2+ ast 38% | |||||
| Kayleigh HeckelG | 14 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 32% · 2+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 31% | |||||
| Jana El AlfyC | 13 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 31% · 4+ reb 43% · 2+ ast 19% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…