Southern at Notre Dame
Women's · Wednesday, November 18, 2026, 7:00 PM ET at Purcell Pavilion. Southern our rank 287 · 0-3; Notre Dame AP 13, our rank 17 · 3-0.
Who will win Southern vs Notre Dame?
The model gives Notre Dame a >99% chance to beat Southern, with a projected score of Notre Dame 92, Southern 47.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 90–100% have been right 96.1% of the time in 10,929 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HidalgoG · 27 min | 22.8 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 25+ 39% | |
| St. RoseG · 26 min | 15.3 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 15+ 51% | |
| MacyF · 24 min | 15.2 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 15+ 50% | |
| HardyF · 23 min | 14.2 | 8.9 | 0.4 | 15+ 44% | |
| HurstonF · 22 min | 6.5 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 5+ 61% | |
| PorterF · 18 min | 5.5 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 5+ 52% | |
| DixonG · 20 min | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 5+ 45% | |
| ThorntonG · 23 min | 4.7 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 5+ 44% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Hannah Hidalgo: Southern 1%Notre Dame 99%
The white mark is the call with her: Notre Dame >99%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Notre Dame without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah Hidalgo | 9.1 | 99% | −1 | 51–87 |
| Anaya Hardy | 5.9 | >99% | 0 | 50–89 |
| Madison St. Rose | 5.7 | >99% | 0 | 50–89 |
| Leah Macy | 2.3 | >99% | 0 | 48–91 |
| DeMya Porter | 1.3 | >99% | 0 | 46–93 |
| Jocelyn Tate | 1.0 | >99% | 0 | 46–92 |
| Jestiny Dixon | 0.7 | >99% | 0 | 46–92 |
Change is in Notre Dame's win chance, in points. Scores read Southern, then Notre Dame. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Southern 0-3LLL
- Nov 10L 47-86at Minnesota
- Nov 7L 28-99at IllinoisDidn't cover +34.5 · Under 129.5
- Nov 2L 39-81at Oklahoma St
- Last 3
- 0–3, scoring 38.0 and allowing 88.7
- Against the spread, this season
- 0–1
- Totals, this season
- 0 over, 1 under
Notre Dame 3-0WWW
- Nov 10W 108-60vs Detroit Mercy
- Nov 6W 123-40vs StonehillCovered −45.5 · Over 146.5
- Nov 1W 99-75vs Villanova
- Last 3
- 3–0, scoring 110.0 and allowing 58.3
- Against the spread, this season
- 1–0
- Totals, this season
- 1 over, 0 under
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Southern | Notre Dame | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 80.7 310th | 113.6 12th |
| Points allowed per 100 | 96.4 227th | 80.8 24th |
| Possessions a game | 72.1 164th | 74.5 24th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 40.6% 356th | 52.4% 3rd |
| Opponents' shooting | 49.1% 348th | 42.6% 31st |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 26.1% 325th | 21.1% 22nd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 31.2% 270th | 36.7% 39th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 214th | 0.21 219th |
The widest gap: Notre Dame's defense (24th) against Southern's offense (310th), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Southern 20, Notre Dame 46
- First-half margin
- Notre Dame by 26.0
- First-half points, both teams
- 65.7
- Projected second half
- Southern 27, Notre Dame 46
- Second-half points, both teams
- 72.9
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Southern, first halves so far
- Led 0 of 3 · 18.7 scored, 44.0 allowed
- Notre Dame, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 2 · 61.5 scored, 21.0 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Southern
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deniya ThorntonG | 23 | 4.7 | 2.6 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
| 5+ pts 44% · 3+ reb 45% · 1+ threes 58% | |||||
| Dalayja Hurt-FloydG | 22 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 2+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 17% · 1+ threes 23% | |||||
| Zaria HurstonF | 22 | 6.5 | 3.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 61% · 3+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 36% | |||||
| Anaja HallC | 20 | 4.4 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 3+ reb 47% | |||||
| Alisha NunleyG | 20 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 28% · 2+ reb 42% · 1+ threes 42% | |||||
| Jestiny DixonG | 20 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 45% · 2+ reb 58% · 1+ threes 25% | |||||
| Taniya LawsonG | 19 | 4.0 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 |
| 5+ pts 35% · 2+ reb 39% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| DeMya PorterF | 18 | 5.5 | 3.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 5+ pts 52% · 3+ reb 58% | |||||
Notre Dame
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hannah HidalgoG | 27 | 22.8 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 1.0 |
| 25+ pts 39% · 7+ reb 46% · 5+ ast 45% | |||||
| Madison St. RoseG | 26 | 15.3 | 4.5 | 2.9 | 1.2 |
| 15+ pts 51% · 5+ reb 44% · 3+ ast 54% | |||||
| Leah MacyF | 24 | 15.2 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 0.3 |
| 15+ pts 50% · 6+ reb 55% · 3+ ast 54% | |||||
| Jacy AbiiG | 24 | 11.7 | 6.5 | 4.5 | 0.6 |
| 10+ pts 60% · 7+ reb 46% · 5+ ast 45% | |||||
| Anaya HardyF | 23 | 14.2 | 8.9 | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| 15+ pts 44% · 9+ reb 50% | |||||
| Jenica LewisG | 20 | 9.9 | 3.3 | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 3+ reb 58% · 3+ ast 54% | |||||
| Amari BylesG | 16 | 4.5 | 3.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 3+ reb 54% · 2+ ast 37% | |||||
| Bella RagoneG | 15 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 2+ reb 60% · 1+ threes 43% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…