Georgia Tech at Princeton
Women's · Sunday, November 22, 2026, 1:00 PM ET at Jadwin Gymnasium. Georgia Tech our rank 77 · 3-1; Princeton our rank 47 · 4-0.
Who will win Georgia Tech vs Princeton?
The model gives Princeton a 81% chance to beat Georgia Tech, with a projected score of Princeton 77, Georgia Tech 66.
Half of games like thisFour in five
Calls of 80–90% have been right 85.0% of the time in 7,719 past games, and the typical miss on the margin is 9.5 points. After the final, the result is pinned to this strip. As of 2:23 AM ET on November 13, 2026. Updated three times a day until tip-off.
Players to watch
| Player | Pts | Reb | Ast | Last games | Chance of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Princeton | |||||
| TallF · 33 min | 21.2 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 20+ 55% | |
| BelkerG · 35 min | 15.4 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 15+ 51% | |
| HutchersonG · 32 min | 11.9 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 10+ 62% | |
| CheaG · 33 min | 8.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 10+ 35% | |
| Georgia Tech | |||||
| WalkerG · 29 min | 16.7 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 15+ 59% | |
| OdeG · 26 min | 10.5 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 10+ 52% | |
| FosterG · 27 min | 9.9 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 10+ 47% | |
| TermisC · 28 min | 7.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 5+ 65% | |
Bars: points in the player's latest games this season. Blue line: tonight's projection. Every regular's line
The game without one player
Without Fadima Tall: Georgia Tech 33%Princeton 67%
The white mark is the call with her: Princeton 81%.
| Player | Points a game she adds | Princeton without her | Change | Projected score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Princeton | ||||
| Fadima Tall | 5.5 | 67% | −14 | 69–74 |
| Olivia Hutcherson | 4.0 | 71% | −10 | 68–75 |
| Skye Belker | 3.4 | 73% | −8 | 68–75 |
| Ashley Chea | 2.5 | 75% | −6 | 67–75 |
| Georgia Tech | ||||
| Talayah Walker | 4.5 | 90% | +9 | 64–79 |
| La'Nya Foster | 2.6 | 86% | +5 | 65–78 |
| Erica Moon | 2.2 | 86% | +5 | 65–78 |
| Ariadna Termis | 1.9 | 85% | +4 | 65–78 |
Change is in Princeton's win chance, in points. Scores read Georgia Tech, then Princeton. A player's value is what the team is better by with her than with a replacement, from the player ratings.
Model against the line
Your call
All of today's gamesPlay-by-play
Team numbers
Form
Georgia Tech 3-1WWLW
- Nov 12W 89-58vs MD Eastern
- Nov 8L 63-81vs West Virginia
- Nov 5W 84-58vs Samford
- Nov 2W 80-65vs Hofstra
- Last 4
- 3–1, scoring 79.0 and allowing 65.5
The spread and the total are the lines logged with each prediction. Form is what happened; the ratings above already count recent games more.
Offense against defense
| Georgia Tech | Princeton | |
|---|---|---|
| Points scored per 100 possessions | 99.3 77th | 108.8 23rd |
| Points allowed per 100 | 88.3 81st | 90.0 108th |
| Possessions a game | 74.0 47th | 69.1 359th |
| Shooting (effective field-goal %) | 47.4% 74th | 47.6% 62nd |
| Opponents' shooting | 47.2% 280th | 44.7% 134th |
| Turnovers, share of possessions | 23.9% 215th | 23.0% 132nd |
| Offensive rebounds, share of misses | 31.6% 246th | 35.3% 68th |
| Free throws per shot | 0.21 177th | 0.23 63rd |
The widest gap: Princeton's offense (23rd) against Georgia Tech's defense (81st), of 363 teams.
First half
- Projected halftime score
- Georgia Tech 31, Princeton 37
- First-half margin
- Princeton by 6.2
- First-half points, both teams
- 67.6
- Projected second half
- Georgia Tech 35, Princeton 40
- Second-half points, both teams
- 75.0
- Tied at the half
- 4%
- Georgia Tech, first halves so far
- Led 3 of 4 · 39.8 scored, 31.2 allowed
- Princeton, first halves so far
- Led 2 of 4 · 32.0 scored, 29.2 allowed
Our own projection, not a sportsbook's first-half line. On 10,911 past games it had not seen, the halftime leader was right 73.0% of the time and the first-half total was off by 8.0 points on average. This season: 404 of 492 halftime leaders right. Scorecard
Player projections
Georgia Tech
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talayah WalkerG | 29 | 16.7 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 15+ pts 59% · 5+ reb 53% · 2+ ast 52% | |||||
| Erica MoonG | 29 | 6.8 | 3.1 | 3.4 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 63% · 3+ reb 55% · 4+ ast 43% | |||||
| Ariadna TermisC | 28 | 7.0 | 2.8 | 2.3 | 0.9 |
| 5+ pts 65% · 3+ reb 48% · 1+ threes 54% | |||||
| La'Nya FosterG | 27 | 9.9 | 4.9 | 2.2 | 0.7 |
| 10+ pts 47% · 5+ reb 50% · 1+ threes 45% | |||||
| Jordan OdeG | 26 | 10.5 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 10+ pts 52% · 2+ ast 50% · 1+ threes 52% | |||||
| Ines NogueroG | 18 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 38% · 3+ reb 51% · 1+ threes 40% | |||||
| Sofia MunozG | 16 | 3.8 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 34% · 2+ ast 61% · 1+ threes 37% | |||||
| Leyre UrdiainG | 15 | 4.5 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 5+ pts 41% · 3+ reb 39% · 1+ threes 41% | |||||
Princeton
| Player | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | 3s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skye BelkerG | 35 | 15.4 | 3.0 | 3.7 | 1.8 |
| 15+ pts 51% · 4+ ast 49% · 2+ threes 49% | |||||
| Ashley CheaG | 33 | 8.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 1.3 |
| 10+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 57% · 4+ ast 59% | |||||
| Fadima TallF | 33 | 21.2 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 1.4 |
| 20+ pts 55% · 10+ reb 51% · 3+ ast 40% | |||||
| Olivia HutchersonG | 32 | 11.9 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 0.1 |
| 10+ pts 62% · 5+ reb 47% · 2+ ast 55% | |||||
| Grace O'SullivanG | 27 | 4.4 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| 5+ pts 40% · 3+ reb 52% · 1+ threes 39% | |||||
| Emily EadieF | 15 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
| 5+ pts 35% · 4+ reb 52% | |||||
| Cristina ParrellaG | 13 | 2.4 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
| 5+ pts 19% · 2+ reb 39% · 1+ threes 27% | |||||
Our own projections from each player's minutes and production, this opponent and the game's pace: not a sportsbook's lines. Under each name, the round numbers the player is about as likely as not to reach. How they have done
Win probability
Game chat
Loading the chat…